I understand sworn testimony of a firearms expert is that James Earl Ray’s rifle scope was sighted improperly.

Now this alone does not prove he didn’t do it.

But don’t you think he would have properly sighted it?

You think he would rely on his ability to judge some hold?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s